bravo
FORT LEWIS, Washington (Reuters) – The court-martial of a U.S. Army officer, who publicly refused to fight in Iraq and criticized the war, could end in a mistrial after the presiding military judge rejected on Wednesday an agreement over the facts of the case.
**snip**
At the center of the dispute is the defense’s assertion that Watada did not deploy to Iraq because he considered it an unlawful order that would make him party to war crimes and as result, it was not his duty to obey it.
in a world and a war where too few people stand up for what they believe is right, i applaud him.