exciting, informative, snarky, and very likely fabricated tales of life as an american expat in london

where is the lion in you to defy him?

by Jen at 6:44 pm on 3.07.2007 | 2 Comments
filed under: rant and rage

The laws which restrict the right to demonstrate in Parliament Square need to be changed, Gordon Brown has said.

A 2005 law created an “exclusion zone” inside which all protests required police permission. Critics say it curbs the right to spontaneous protest.

It was partly a response to anti-war protester Brian Haw, whose round-the-clock vigil in Parliament Square, using placards and loudspeakers had annoyed MPs and peers.

The Home Office has also said the law was necessary for security reasons – it had been argued that a bomb could be left beneath Mr Haw’s signs.

But while Mr Haw remains in the square, having been granted police permission for a reduced protest, many other unauthorised, peaceful, protests have been broken up.

The restrictions have been heavily criticised and the subject of several unauthorised protests themselves.

In January Lib Dem Baroness Miller said the 2005 Act had had a “chilling” effect on demonstrations, as many people believed they were totally banned.

i’ve written here before about brian haw. i find it astounding that he has managed to out-last those who would try to silence him.

i’ve been increasingly uneasy living in a country where i do not feel free to protest – not only because of the above, but also because until very recently i was subject to immigration restrictions, and not least because if i were to be arrested for any reason, i would have my dna put on the database. and it seems there is more and more every day that i want to protest about.

still, this can only be a good thing.

kaiser chiefs – i predict a riot

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

2 Comments »

back to the drawing board

by Jen at 6:22 pm on 29.06.2007Comments Off
filed under: rant and rage

and just like that, enforced school desegregation is over.

boston bussing
image of boston bussing courtesy of pbs

coming from boston, where desegregration of all white schools only occurred in the mid-seventies via bussing, and racial tensions ran so high that there were near riots, i fear what this means for the education system. the disparity between the schools which have, and the schools which have not is already so high. urban inner-city schools (read: majority minority schools) are already left to fester, while schools funded by high property taxes in the burbs flourish. the problem is that in big cities, it remains nearly impossible to separate issues of race from the socio-economic forces which continue to lead to greater levels of impoverishment amongst minorities. so you can’t make decisions which eliminate race as a factor without subsequently redressing the rest of the imbalances.

pretending the playing field is level, won’t make it so. and it’s the children who’ll suffer for our folly.

1 person likes this post.
Technorati Tags ,
Comments Off

now you’ve just been spoken for

by Jen at 6:21 pm on 25.06.2007 | 3 Comments
filed under: rant and rage

I’m far from a patriotic person, but the longer I’m here, the more annoyed I get at the gross generalisations about America.

When I first moved here, just after the start of the Iraq war, I felt like I had to be a bit of an apologist for my country, always ready to disavow the war, the re-election of bush, the downward diplomatic spiral the u.s. government has seemed hellbent on accelerating for the past 4 years.

And so perhaps i also felt in many ways that america deserved the slagging off it was getting in the media and public opinion. i occasionally even joined in, because it felt good to talk about politics i knew, to reach common ground with people. they didn’t understand me, and i didn’t understand them, but we both understood that the u.s. sucked.

but as the years crawl on, my eyes have been opened to just how widespread and virulent anti-american sentiment really is. it’s not just about the war, or george bush. most news about the states is cast in a disparaging light, with inferred eye rolling and a tinge of smug superiority. anything brits adopt which originated in the u.s. is scornfully derided as the “americanisation of britain”, often with a sense of alarm. the stereotypes about loud, fat, dumb, insular americans run rampant.

Don’t get me wrong, Americans can generalise as well, and America has more than its ample share of faults and foibles. But often it seems to be open season on America, as if it’s the sole symbol of all that’s excessive and brash about the west. As if we somehow have a patent on being rude or crass or excessive.

believe me when i tell you that america has not got the market cornered on being overweight, borish, consumerist or even (need i point out) imperialist. we’re in good company with our “special relationship” friends. to sling trite insults or facile prejudices around simply because it’s fashionable to do so says much more about the slinger than the slingee. it’s a diversionary tactic which enables them to avoid having to look too closely at the growing problems here in their own country. the sedentary, high-fat lifestyle is alive and well here – americans may have invented mcdonald’s but no one is forcing it down the brits throats at gunpoint. the dumbing-down of society and the media which feeds it is also hardly a uniquely american phenomenon – xenophobic, right-wing, sensationalist rags posing as newspapers are, i would argue comparable to anything fox news churns out in the u.s. and british tourists may spend more time in other european countries than their american counterparts, but from my experience are more obnoxious, unadventurous and inebriated – hardly ambassadors of culture.

i could go on, but it’s almost tangential to the point. which is simply that, while we may have deservingly brought some well-earned criticism upon ourselves, brits too often set america up as a straw man. and it’s easy to take potshots, because we are a big target, and there’s almost no one on this side of the pond willing to offer a different perspective, let alone wade through the morass of factual inaccuracies.

i ain’t defending america – but i’m sick of ill-informed people shooting their mouths off, and passing it off as erudite political commentary, or even news.

so it’s refreshing to run across this, even if it is a bit pollyanna-ish and errs too far on the side of the hollywood image that’s so often portrayed (and just as incorrect in its stereotyping as the knee-jerk critics). still, it’s nice to read something, hell *anything* complementary. as she says, “disdaining Americans has become a national sport, regardless of the fact that it requires the skill of all sports involving fish, guns and barrels.”

i’ll take it where i can get it.

(if you want to get a gander at some of the less savoury elements of anti-americanism that exist here, read the comments – utterly depressing.)

no doubt – hateful (clash cover)

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

1 person likes this post.
3 Comments »

see? i’m not as crazy as i sound

by Jen at 10:10 pm on 19.06.2007Comments Off
filed under: rant and rage

i know i go on and on about erosion of privacy issues. but finally: proof i’m not alone in my google-paranoia!

Most people missed the announcement about how Google wants to burrow inside your brain and capture your most intimate thoughts. That’s because it never happened.

But Google, the world leader in Web search services, is the focus of mounting paranoia over the scope of its powers as it expands into new advertising formats from online video to radio and TV, while creating dozens of new Internet services.

As people spend more time online and realize just how much information Google is collecting about their habits and interests, the fear develops that true or false revelations of the most personal, embarrassing or even intrusive kind are no more than a Web search away.

Also last month, Google took a big step to unify its different categories of Internet search — for images, news, books, Web sites, local information, video — in one service.

Unified Search offers no information not already available on Google, but by putting it all in one place, it is turning up sometimes disconcerting links between previously unconnected types of data.

New rules are needed to fend off governments which might try to force companies to divulge customer data, Google argues. It fought off just such a court request by U.S. authorities last year and argues that for the limited purposes it keeps customers’ data, it is a reliable custodian.

samiam – search and destroy (stooges cover)

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

1 person likes this post.
Comments Off

revisiting sociology 101

by Jen at 6:10 pm on 15.06.2007Comments Off
filed under: rant and rage

back in uni, i took a course called sociology of crime. i don’t claim to remember much from it, but one of the things that really stuck in my head was when we started to examine the statistics of race and crime. my professor explained that there were two ways of looking at the disproportionately high number of people of colour represented in arrrests/convictions/incarceration figures, as compared to the proportion they make up of the general population. a) the first, is to assume that people of colour engage in more crime. b) the second is to examine whether people of colour are disproportionately scrutinised due to beliefs grounded in previous assumption a.

which is why this is a perfect example of why examining perceptions about race and crime are so important.

Black community in crime ‘crisis’. Parts of the UK’s black community face a “serious crisis” with young people becoming involved in crime, MPs say.

The Commons home affairs committee said the number of black men in the criminal justice system was “unacceptable”.

It blamed social exclusion, absent fathers, lack of positive role models and real or perceived racial discrimination by the authorities.

Committee chairman John Denham said there was no evidence young black people committed more crime than other groups.

The report said there was “evidence to support allegations of direct or indirect discrimination in policing and the youth justice system”.

But it added: “The perception as well as the reality of discrimination has an impact.

Black people make up 2.7% of the UK population aged 10 to 17, but represent 8.5% of those in that age group arrested in England and Wales, the report said.

And it found that three in four young black men would soon be on the national DNA database.

“This is not only a crisis for the black community, its a crisis for the whole of society,” said a CRE spokesman.

y’know, that last sentence is the smartest thing in the whole article.

1 person likes this post.
Comments Off

can’t swim in a town this shallow

by Jen at 6:08 pm on 10.06.2007Comments Off
filed under: rant and rage

The amount of official material being translated by bodies such as councils should be cut to encourage immigrants to learn English, Ruth Kelly has said.

Ms Kelly said: “I do think translation has been used too frequently and sometimes without thought added to the consequences.”

She added: “So, for example, it’s quite possible for someone to come here from Pakistan and elsewhere in the world and to find that materials are routinely translated into their mother tongue and therefore not have the incentive to learn English.”

Ms Kelly accepted there was a “real paradox” in the fact that many young Muslims involved in violence and terrorism were British-born English speakers who appeared to be well integrated.

what a fucking crock of shit. taking away translative services isn’t *incentive* – it’s punishment, plain and simple.

some days, i’m so sick of this place which continually penalises legitimate, hard-working im/migrants, in a misguided knee-jerk effort to control home-grown terrorism… which bears absolutely no relation to the population they’re cracking down on.

death cab for cutie – why you’d want to live here

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Comments Off

If you’ve got a blacklist, I want to be on it

by Jen at 4:18 pm on 5.06.2007 | 5 Comments
filed under: londonlife, rant and rage

the newest hairbrained voter-brown-nosing scheme? earning citizenship by points.

Applicants for British passports would face a points-based system linked to their employment and community work under proposals to be outlined by ministers.

The existing citizenship requirement that a person must have lived in Britain for five years, pass a test in English and demonstrate knowledge of life in Britain would be expanded to include points awarded for civic and voluntary work.

The ministers will propose that credits or points be awarded for the amount of money that a person brings with them, their employment record and for any voluntary or other work in the community.

i have no problem with every country determining for itself what constitutes citizenship (though the idea that how much money you have should have *anything* to do with citizenship is repugnant and classist in the extreme.) i may think it’s completely unfeasible and totally lacking in common sense (i mean, how many native-born brits do volunteer work?!), but they have the right to impose whatever arbitrary rules they want.

my ire is reserved for this:

Mr Byrne admitted that record numbers of asylum-seekers and the huge inflow of East European migrants had damaged public confidence in the immigration system.

in other words, it’s a response to backlash against the numbers of refugees and eu migrants (who don’t want or need uk citizenship anyway), neither of which they can easily control.

so those of use who’re most at the mercy of the home office have to pay the price. we’re already required to prove we can support ourselves, speak english, memorise british trivia, take a test, and pay taxes. (oh, and pay close to two thousand pounds along that celebrated road to citizenship.)

the irony is, you don’t *need* to become a citizen – once you have permanent residency, citizenship is entirely elective. disincentivising* citizenship accomplishes absolutely nothing.

oh well, it’ll generate savings for the passport office, i suppose.

*yes, i know it’s not in any dictionary, but it’s considered a real word over here.

billy bragg – waiting for the great leap forwards

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

5 Comments »

pot, meet kettle

by Jen at 8:54 pm on 30.05.2007Comments Off
filed under: rant and rage

for as often as i call the u.s. a police state…

British Prime Minister Tony Blair plans to push through a new anti-terrorism law before he steps down next month giving “wartime” powers to police to stop and question people, a newspaper reported on Sunday.

…snip…

The “stop and question” power would enable police to interrogate people about who they are, where they have been and where they were going, The Sunday Times said. Police would not need to suspect a crime had taken place.

If suspects failed to stop or refused to answer questions, they could be charged with a crime and fined, The Sunday Times said. Police already have the power to stop and search people but have no right to ask them their identity and movements.

my oft-opined views on the erosion of privacy rights can found here, here, here, and elsewhere. i’m feeling too disheartened to work up a proper rage

(thanks andy)

the clash – police and thieves

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Comments Off

conceding the point

by Jen at 6:15 pm on 24.05.2007 | 9 Comments
filed under: rant and rage

one of the things about being married to a south african is that i’m often called to account for why america is the way it is. as the sole native representative in our flat, i’m asked about the vagaries or unique peculiarities that an outsider wouldn’t necessarily understand. so sometimes i get into discussions with j where i try (ineptly) to explain some of the differentiations between federal and state law. not that i fully understand them all the time myself, mind you. and there are plenty of times when, in trying to untangle the complicated knot of confusion that is our legal system, that i just have to concede the point to j as he states the obvious: my country is fucked.

for example, in massachusetts same sex marriage is legal, and entitled to all the same legal rights and privileges as any other marriage. children born in that marriage, therefore, are automatically legally bound to both parents.

that same sex marriage is not, however, recognised by federal law. the federal government also says no other state is required to recognise same sex marriages. (i have *no* idea how that works for tax purposes, but whatever.)

meanwhile, back in viginia, mary cheney and her partner of 15 years have had a child, and not only can they not get married or even have a civil union (not that i know if they’d even want to) but her partner has absolutely no legal ties to the baby. can’t even adopt as a second parent. set aside for a moment how incredibly sad that is, and move one step next door to maryland, and it’s yet another different ball of wax.

now how am i supposed to explain *that*? that even though a couple from massachusetts may consider themselves married, god forbid they get into an accident across the border in new hampshire, because suddenly none of those rights apply. and you haven’t travelled to another country, or even a different time zone. you can be 10 miles from where you started that morning and yet you’re no longer considered your spouse’s next of kin. and in the eyes of the federal government, you never were. and if that same couple move to virginia, how does the state consider their child?

of course to an outsider, it’s beyond ridiculous. forget about the subtle nuances of respect and love – it’s a mess because when citizens of the same country are at the mercy of such disparate political agendas, you can’t even pretend that everyone is equal under the same constitution. any notions of equality are completely undermined by variances in state law. so when j says things like, “how’re you supposed to know what the laws are if you’re not a native of the state?” “how can you have different gun laws from one place to the next?” “how come some felons can vote in some parts of the country, and others can’t?” “why don’t residents of washington dc have elected representation in congress?” i just have to nod my head in depressing agreement.

my country is fucked.

division of laura lee – the truth is fucked

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

9 Comments »

unnerving

by Jen at 7:01 pm on 23.05.2007Comments Off
filed under: rant and rage

Google invests in genetics firm

Google has taken a stake in a biotech company co-founded by the wife of one of the search engine giant’s bosses.

According to a report in the Financial Times, chief executive Eric Schmidt said Google believes personal information will be one of the firm’s key avenues of future expansion.

“The algorithms will get better and we will get better at personalisation,” he was quoted as saying.

“The goal is to enable Google users to be able to ask the question such as ‘What shall I do tomorrow?’ and ‘What job shall I take?’”

my emails (those sent to other’s gmail accounts), my web history, and now potentially my dna – all linked tidily together to one account. which of course the government will *never* be able to touch roll

it’s not that i don’t trust google (or even whoever google may sell that info to) – it’s that i don’t trust my government to stay *out* of google. i don’t trust my government any further than i can throw dick cheney.

link my genetic fingerprint to that account? no thanks.

foo fighters – best of you

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Comments Off

our american life

by Jen at 9:35 pm on 22.05.2007Comments Off
filed under: rant and rage

i’m a few weeks behind in my podcasts, so i was listening to this american life on my run tonight.

i’m ashamed to admit that i usually try to tune out the news about guantanamo bay, because frankly, it makes me feel simultaneously enraged and full of despair, and i just can’t handle walking around in that frame of mind – it eats me up. and if i, sitting in my safe, comfortable flat, feel enraged and despairing, i can’t even begin to fathom the mental anguish of the innocent people (because there *are* innocent people there) who’ve been held, in what is for all intents and purposes a black hole of deprivation and torture, for the past six years. no rights, no recourse, no end in sight.

but i listened to this american life tonight – they recently rebroadcast a piece they did a year ago on former detainees who’d been released from guantanamo, called “habeas schmabeas”. and if you haven’t already heard it, i strongly encourage you to listen. it’s deeply moving to hear the voices of those who thought they’d lost their lives forever. and it’s a stark and important reminder of just how dangerous my country has become, when it believes it no longer needs to operate in accordance with the principles it was founded on. it’s fundamentally unamerican. it’s a reminder that we *can’t afford* to tune out the news about guantanamo – because the media is now the only voice they have. if we don’t listen, don’t remember, don’t keep hold of the rage, then their situation becomes truly hopeless.

i’m ashamed to admit i needed that reminder, sitting here in my safe, comfortable flat.

you can download, listen, or read the transcripts of the show here.

laura sweden – release me

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Technorati Tags , ,
Comments Off

in a nation of plenty

by Jen at 11:07 pm on 17.05.2007Comments Off
filed under: rant and rage

surprise, surprise: politicians discover what any 10 year old knows – it’s impossible to eat well on $3.50 a day.

Hunger activists challenged New Yorkers yesterday to try spending only $3.50 on food, just for one day, to get a taste of what life is like for folks who actually have to rely on food stamps.

It’s the latest installment of Let’s Make a Meal, the “paltry pantry” game that started last month when the governors of Oregon and Utah took a “food stamp challenge” and tried to eat on a meager $3 a day, which the average food stamp recipient does by necessity, as opposed to novelty.

Not that $3 a day goes very far, anyway; you’ve got to get the maximum calories for the minimum price, which means filling up on cheap fats and carbs like peanut butter and ramen noodles. Fresh fruits and vegetables? Might as well be caviar. We subsidize commodity crops like corn and soybeans, keeping the price of nutritionally bankrupt processed foods artificially low, while doing nothing for the “specialty crops,” which is what the USDA calls the fruits and vegetables it tells us we’re supposed to eat five to nine servings of each day. Isn’t that special?

and so, 40 million people in poverty continue to have higher incidence of obesity, hypertension, diabetes, while trying to count ketchup as a vegetable. that’s shameful.

good nutrition isn’t rocket science – but apparently funding it is.

Comments Off

if man is five, then the devil is six

by Jen at 9:35 pm on 15.05.2007Comments Off
filed under: rant and rage

i’m not one to take pleasure in anyone else’s passing, but i can’t help but feel that the world will be just a little kinder without the likes of the reverend jerry falwell.

for the benefit of any uk readers, jerry falwell embodied everything that is intolerant, misogynist, and homophobic about the ultra-conservative religious right in the u.s.

some of his more memorable quotes:

“AIDS is not just God’s punishment for homosexuals; it is God’s punishment for the society that tolerates homosexuals.”

“I really believe that the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People For the American Way, all of them who have tried to secularize America. I point the finger in their face and say ‘you helped this happen.” (re:the Sept. 11th attacks)

“I listen to feminists and all these radical gals – most of them are failures. They’ve blown it. Some of them have been married, but they married some Casper Milquetoast who asked permission to go to the bathroom. These women just need a man in the house. That’s all they need. Most of the feminists need a man to tell them what time of day it is and to lead them home. And they blew it and they’re mad at all men. Feminists hate men. They’re sexist. They hate men – that’s their problem.”

“I think Mohammed was a terrorist. I read enough by both Muslims and non-Muslims, (to decide) that he was a violent man, a man of war.”

oh, and let’s not forget, he was the person who first outed teletubby tinky winky, thus saving millions of little children from a life of tv-induced homosexuality! surely he’s going to heaven for that alone!

still, as full of hatred as he was, i can’t hate him – only pity.

pixies – monkey gone to heaven

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Technorati Tags
Comments Off

staff shortage

by Jen at 6:50 am on 11.05.2007Comments Off
filed under: blurblets, londonlife, rant and rage

nothing pisses me off more in the mornings than hearing there are delays on the tube due to the all-too-frequent “staff shortage”.

in what kind of parallel universe is this an acceptable excuse?! they might as well say, “our staff (who already get 35 days holiday a year) are too lazy to bother showing up for work, and we’re too incompetent to have a backup coverage plan to make sure we can operate a service, so even though you’re paying the same full fare, tough tittie for you if *you’re* actually expected to show up to *work*.”

it’s beyond infuriating.

Comments Off

because i’m lucky

by Jen at 1:46 pm on 6.05.2007 | 16 Comments
filed under: like a fish needs a bicycle

because i’m lucky enough to live in a country where this doesn’t happen, i have an obligation to fight for those who are not as fortunate – who can be killed for being a woman. because there but for the grace of god, go i.

(full disclosure: i can’t (won’t) watch the video – i know there are horrors carried out against women in this world that are best left to my imagination.)

if you’re lucky enough too, please sign the petition.

read amnesty’s statement on the killing (and subsequent retaliation killings) here.

(with thanks to anglofille)

Technorati Tags , , , , ,
16 Comments »

dear bbc breakfast, part 2

by Jen at 9:01 am on 20.04.2007Comments Off
filed under: like a fish needs a bicycle

surely, if your country, one of the most powerful countries in the world, was lead by a woman for more than 10 years – surely then, isn’t *entertaining* the laughable topic of “should a woman commentator call the football match of the day” on a national breakfast programme downright insulting?

(oh, and i’m pretty sure as a 43-year-old professional, she’d prefer *not* to be called a “girl”, as your male co-host referred to her.)

thanks for the sexism with my toast.

sincerely yours,
Jen

Comments Off

the time is now

by Jen at 10:17 pm on 18.04.2007Comments Off
filed under: rant and rage

I HATE guns. HATE. Would love to see them wiped off the face of the earth. Guns are the machinery of death.

as idealistic as i usually am though, i reluctantly admit that I don’t think we’re ever going to be able to rid the US of guns. The horses have left the stable on that one already. You can’t unwrite a 200 year old love story.

After every one of these horrifying events (and how sickening is it to even be able to use that phrase?) there’s the urgent clamor to *do* something, to make sure this never happens again, to ensure the victims didn’t die in vain. so we try to help people with mental illness, we try to improve security in public places, we try to raise awareness of potential warning signs. time and again, we try doing all these things. we’ve attempted to address these elements since mass shootings began occurring. **shudder**

but the one proposal we’ve never really committed to is gun control. there are noises, and then the NRA trots out the old chestnut about how “guns don’t kill people, people kill people”, and dusts off the “right to bear arms” amendment. and eventually the large font headlines about “massacres” and “bloodbaths” slide off the front page, and everyone dives into the bliss of forgetfulness. and nothing ever happens.

there are other ways to kill people of course, but none so cheap, readily available and ruthlessly lethal as guns.

Britain’s 46 homicides involving firearms last year was the lowest since the late 1980s. New York City, with 8 million people compared to 53 million in England and Wales, recorded 590 homicides last year.

you simply can’t argue that gun control doesn’t work. you just can’t. there are lots of countries with lots of guns that have fewer gun deaths than the u.s. – but you can’t point to a single country with strict gun control laws with a record *worse* than that of the u.s. because there isn’t one.

gun control doesn’t solve all of society’s problems. but fewer people die violent, senseless deaths.

we can’t just continue to do nothing again… until the next time.

nas – one mic

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Technorati Tags , ,
Comments Off

the sirens inside

by Jen at 7:45 pm on 16.04.2007 | 1 Comment
filed under: rant and rage

this has really kind of rocked me, here in my little world, so far away. i’m sitting here listening to the news and remembering watching columbine unfold live on television in front of my eyes, and how hard i prayed back then.

it’s all such a fucking senseless loss. so goddamn senseless.

i wish i could make sense of it.

grant them peace.

jose gonzales – crosses

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

1 Comment »

morning rant

by Jen at 7:30 am on Comments Off
filed under: rant and rage

bills like this infuriate me.

i understand the necessity of detaining people who have actually committed an assault, or who pose a true threat to their own safety because of their mental health problems. but those two scenarios are already dealt with under existing law.

this bill is rooted in fear and ignorance of mental illness. taking away a person’s freedom should only be done as a last resort when the preponderance of evidence shows that someone’s safety is seriously at risk – the same way the law requires for people *without* mental health issues. people with mental illness are entitled to the same protection of the law.

now if they *really* wanted to do something about public safety, they should be locking up the drunken, aggressive yobs that stumble out of the pubs. statistically, they’re far more likely to harm or kill someone than a person with mental illness. let’s lock *them* up before they decide to glass someone in the face, or have a punchup with the local shopkeeper, or assault a night bus driver.

oh wait – that’s not allowed.

more on this later today.

Comments Off

only fools and horses

by Jen at 10:28 pm on 13.04.2007 | 4 Comments
filed under: like a fish needs a bicycle

i don’t know why the tradition of “ladies’ day” before the grand national race nettles me so. perhaps tying a parade of elitist women in ridiculous fashions so closely with the display of elitist thoroughbred horses just sets my teeth on edge. perhaps the implicit association between the expensively groomed trophy wives and the expensively groomed animals just rubs me the wrong way.

perhaps i’m reading too much into it.

i’ll let you be the judge.

ladiesday
ladiesday2
ladiesday3
aintree

jurassic 5 – a day at the races

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Technorati Tags
4 Comments »

yeah – what *she* said!!

by Jen at 10:37 am on 9.04.2007 | 2 Comments
filed under: like a fish needs a bicycle

i had more than a few thoughts on the ridiculously sexist way the media sensationalised the woman naval officer who was amongst the recent british hostages in iran, but amity said them far better than I ever could:

To use and exploit motherhood to evoke emotions in the public, emotions everyone thinks are valid and chivalrous, is to further male-dominated agendas and knock women’s lib down a peg or two. The message is clear: the men were brave, the woman was saved. And now that she’s selling her story, insisting that it’s something ‘extraordinary’ when it was her job, what she signed up to do, pisses me off even more. There is nothing extraordinary about being a woman, being a mother, and being in the military. Millions of women do it every day. To pretend otherwise is to confirm what many have known all along — women are still not equal, in the boardroom or in the war zones, both at home and abroad. Turney exemplifies this and willingly makes herself a part of that prejudice.

so go read her post instead.

the decemberists – sixteen military wives

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Technorati Tags , , ,
2 Comments »
« Previous PageNext Page »